Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 8:18:08 GMT 1
The its first one of these maybe it was we saw that keyword use in the title element was strongly correlated. I think it was probably around . . something like that. Then over time its gone way way down. Now its something like . extremely small infinitesimally small. What does that mean Well it could mean one of two things. It could mean Google is using it less as a ranking factor.
It could mean that it was never connected and its just total speculation total America Mobile Number List coincidence. Or three it could mean that a lot more people who rank in the top or results which is what these studies usually look at top to top sometimes a lot more of them are putting the keyword in the title and therefore theres just no difference between result number and result number because they both have them in the title. So youre seeing a much lower correlation between pages that dont have them and do have them and higher rankings. So be careful about how you intuit that.
Oh e final note. I did put . here. A negative correlation means that as you see less of this thing you tend to see higher rankings. Again unless there is a strong negative correlation I tend to watch out for these or I tend to not pay too much attention. For example the keyword in the meta description it could just be that well it turns out pretty much everyone has the keyword in the meta description now so this is just not a big differentiating factor. What is correlation good for All right. Whats correlation actually good for We talked about a bunch of myths ways not to use it. A. IDing the elements that more successful pages tend to have So if I look across a correlation and I see that lots of pages are twice as likely to have.
It could mean that it was never connected and its just total speculation total America Mobile Number List coincidence. Or three it could mean that a lot more people who rank in the top or results which is what these studies usually look at top to top sometimes a lot more of them are putting the keyword in the title and therefore theres just no difference between result number and result number because they both have them in the title. So youre seeing a much lower correlation between pages that dont have them and do have them and higher rankings. So be careful about how you intuit that.
Oh e final note. I did put . here. A negative correlation means that as you see less of this thing you tend to see higher rankings. Again unless there is a strong negative correlation I tend to watch out for these or I tend to not pay too much attention. For example the keyword in the meta description it could just be that well it turns out pretty much everyone has the keyword in the meta description now so this is just not a big differentiating factor. What is correlation good for All right. Whats correlation actually good for We talked about a bunch of myths ways not to use it. A. IDing the elements that more successful pages tend to have So if I look across a correlation and I see that lots of pages are twice as likely to have.